Invite to Supreme Court
Janis Schmidt
418 Griffin St.
Warwick, ND 58381
701-294-2196
April 26, 2011
Tiffany Johnson
Gary Thune
Pearce & Durick
PO Box 400
Bismarck, ND
Re: Janis Lee Schmidt v. Warwick Public School District 29, et al., No 10-10070
Dear Ms. Johnson,
It gives me great pleasure to notify you that my Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court was filed on April 12, 2011, and placed on the docket April 21, 2011. It gives me even greater pleasure to inform you that your Brief in Opposition is due Monday, May 23, 2011, should you choose to write a brief.
It truly warms my heart at the thought of you arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court, explaining to the Justices just why it wasn’t necessary for Supt. Charles Guthrie, Principal Gene Riedinger, and counselor Shirley Tiokiason to report a rape that happened to one of their students, because the rape occurred on an Indian Reservation.
It makes me ecstatic at the thought of you explaining to the Justices how I needed to be immediately fired because I allegedly talked to Indian students about Leonard Peltier, which you like to call “administrative” leave. I would absolutely love to have you explain to the Justices exactly how administrative leave works, in lieu of a dismissal hearing.
I am so glad to give you this opportunity to appear before the U.S. Supreme Court so that you can dazzle them with your clever arguments as you did the North Dakota Supreme Court on October 6, 2010. I am sure they will be very impressed with you. Enclosed is the formal notification from the U.S. Supreme Court, which I was asked to serve on you as counsel for the Defendants in this case. And I remind you it is your duty to notify all of the Defendants named in this lawsuit.
This is an opportunity of a lifetime, to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court, and to think that you have me to thank for it. Have a very good day.
Most cordially yours,
Janis Schmidt.
418 Griffin St.
Warwick, ND 58381
701-294-2196
April 26, 2011
Tiffany Johnson
Gary Thune
Pearce & Durick
PO Box 400
Bismarck, ND
Re: Janis Lee Schmidt v. Warwick Public School District 29, et al., No 10-10070
Dear Ms. Johnson,
It gives me great pleasure to notify you that my Petition to the U.S. Supreme Court was filed on April 12, 2011, and placed on the docket April 21, 2011. It gives me even greater pleasure to inform you that your Brief in Opposition is due Monday, May 23, 2011, should you choose to write a brief.
It truly warms my heart at the thought of you arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court, explaining to the Justices just why it wasn’t necessary for Supt. Charles Guthrie, Principal Gene Riedinger, and counselor Shirley Tiokiason to report a rape that happened to one of their students, because the rape occurred on an Indian Reservation.
It makes me ecstatic at the thought of you explaining to the Justices how I needed to be immediately fired because I allegedly talked to Indian students about Leonard Peltier, which you like to call “administrative” leave. I would absolutely love to have you explain to the Justices exactly how administrative leave works, in lieu of a dismissal hearing.
I am so glad to give you this opportunity to appear before the U.S. Supreme Court so that you can dazzle them with your clever arguments as you did the North Dakota Supreme Court on October 6, 2010. I am sure they will be very impressed with you. Enclosed is the formal notification from the U.S. Supreme Court, which I was asked to serve on you as counsel for the Defendants in this case. And I remind you it is your duty to notify all of the Defendants named in this lawsuit.
This is an opportunity of a lifetime, to argue before the U.S. Supreme Court, and to think that you have me to thank for it. Have a very good day.
Most cordially yours,
Janis Schmidt.
Comments